April 30, 2013
"

Among the more serious arguments against liberalizing immigration is that it can be costly to taxpayers. Low-skilled immigrants in particular consume more government services than they pay in taxes, increasing the burden of government for native-born Americans. Organizations such as the Center for Immigration Studies, the Heritage Foundation, and the Federation for American Immigration Reform have produced reports claiming that immigration costs taxpayers tens of billions of dollars a year, with the heaviest costs borne by state and local taxpayers. No less a classical liberal than Milton Freidman mused that open immigration is incompatible with a welfare state. Responding to a question at a libertarian conference in 1999, Friedman rejected the idea of opening the U.S. border to all immigrants, declaring that “You cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state” (Free Students 2008).

Contrary to those concerns, immigration to the United States does not pose a long-term burden on U.S. taxpayers. The typical immigrant and his or her descendants pay more in taxes than they consume in government services in terms of net present value. Lowskilled immigrants do impose a net cost on government, in particular on the state and local level, but those costs are often exaggerated by critics of immigration and are offset by broader benefits to the overall economy. And with all due respect to Milton Freidman, practical steps can be taken to allow nations such as the United States to reap the benefits of a more open immigration system while maintaining certain welfare programs for citizens.

"

Daniel T. Griswold, Cato Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Winter 2012)

1:35pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZMMjnxjudh0s
  
Filed under: politics immigration 
April 11, 2013
"In a nation that prides itself on the fact that everyone accused of a crime — murderers, rapists — has the right to a lawyer, undocumented immigrants, even when they are unaccompanied children, are not entitled to a public defender. Although some children are represented by pro bono lawyers or, for the few whose families can afford it, private lawyers, it’s estimated that more than half of them go to court alone. These children — some as young as 2 years old — have no one to help them make the case that they should not be deported."

Sonia Nazario, “Child Migrants, Alone in Court”

2:05pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZMMjnxiRwsxp
  
Filed under: politics immigration 
February 20, 2013
anarcho-queer:

2 Out of Every 3 Americans Lost Fourth Amendment Protections To DHS
Two out of every three people reading this could have your electronic devices searched, without there being any reasonable suspicion, because the Department of Homeland Security has decided that such search and seizures do not violate your Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. Border agents don’t need probable cause and they don’t need a stinking warrant since they don’t need to prove any reasonable suspicion first. Nor, sadly, do two out of three people have First Amendment protection; it is as if DHS has voided those Constitutional amendments and protections they provide to nearly 200 million Americans.
Those numbers come from the ACLU’s estimates of how many people live within 100 miles of the United States border, since Homeland Security’s Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CLCR) concluded that border searches of electronic devices do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Previously, the ACLU called this area the Constitution-Free Zone and provided a map showing how many people within states along the all our borders are affected without constitutional rights. The estimate is that nearly two out of three Americans live in the Constitution-Free Zone.
Don’t be silly by thinking this means only if you are physically trying to cross the international border. As we saw when discussing the DEA using license plate readers and data-mining to track Americans movements, the U.S. “border” stretches out 100 miles beyond the true border. Godfather Politics added:

But wait, it gets even better!  If you live anywhere in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey or Rhode Island, DHS says the search zones encompass the entire state.

The Fourth Amendment states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the entire DHS report about suspicionless and warrantless “border” searches of electronic devices. ACLU attorney Catherine Crump said “We hope to establish that the Department of Homeland Security can’t simply assert that its practices are legitimate without showing us the evidence, and to make it clear that the government’s own analyses of how our fundamental rights apply to new technologies should be openly accessible to the public for review and debate.”
Meanwhile, the EFF has tips to protect yourself and your devices against border searches. If you think you know all about it, then you might try testing your knowledge with a defending privacy at the U.S. border quiz.

LTMC: I’m working on a case right now that deals with Border searches.  The law in this area is terrible for criminal defendants.  Search & Seizures on the border are essentially romparoo for federal law enforcement officials, unless the circumstances of the search & seizure fall into one of a few incredibly narrow exceptions.

anarcho-queer:

2 Out of Every 3 Americans Lost Fourth Amendment Protections To DHS

Two out of every three people reading this could have your electronic devices searched, without there being any reasonable suspicion, because the Department of Homeland Security has decided that such search and seizures do not violate your Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. Border agents don’t need probable cause and they don’t need a stinking warrant since they don’t need to prove any reasonable suspicion first. Nor, sadly, do two out of three people have First Amendment protection; it is as if DHS has voided those Constitutional amendments and protections they provide to nearly 200 million Americans.

Those numbers come from the ACLU’s estimates of how many people live within 100 miles of the United States border, since Homeland Security’s Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CLCR) concluded that border searches of electronic devices do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Previously, the ACLU called this area the Constitution-Free Zone and provided a map showing how many people within states along the all our borders are affected without constitutional rights. The estimate is that nearly two out of three Americans live in the Constitution-Free Zone.

Don’t be silly by thinking this means only if you are physically trying to cross the international border. As we saw when discussing the DEA using license plate readers and data-mining to track Americans movements, the U.S. “border” stretches out 100 miles beyond the true border. Godfather Politics added:

But wait, it gets even better!  If you live anywhere in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey or Rhode Island, DHS says the search zones encompass the entire state.

The Fourth Amendment statesThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the entire DHS report about suspicionless and warrantless “border” searches of electronic devices. ACLU attorney Catherine Crump said “We hope to establish that the Department of Homeland Security can’t simply assert that its practices are legitimate without showing us the evidence, and to make it clear that the government’s own analyses of how our fundamental rights apply to new technologies should be openly accessible to the public for review and debate.

Meanwhile, the EFF has tips to protect yourself and your devices against border searches. If you think you know all about it, then you might try testing your knowledge with a defending privacy at the U.S. border quiz.

LTMC: I’m working on a case right now that deals with Border searches.  The law in this area is terrible for criminal defendants.  Search & Seizures on the border are essentially romparoo for federal law enforcement officials, unless the circumstances of the search & seizure fall into one of a few incredibly narrow exceptions.

(via antigovernmentextremist)

February 8, 2013
"One of President Obama’s markers on the path to citizenship is “paying taxes,” but most illegal immigrants already do so. As Reason Foundation Senior Analyst Shikha Dalmia has reported, in 2006 an estimated 8 million illegal immigrants—up to two thirds of the total—paid taxes, including both income taxes and Medicare and Social Security taxes. Indeed, revenue from illegal immigrants is estimated at $11 billion a year to Social Security alone, and there’s not even a pretense of those payments leading to eventual benefits. And of course everyone who buys things in the U.S. pays sales taxes, irrespective of their immigration status. Undoubtedly, even more illegal immigrants would pay taxes if they didn’t have to worry about possible deportation as a consequence."

5 Reasons To Grant Amnesty To Illegal Immigrants

12:36am  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZMMjnxdf0m1A
  
Filed under: politics immigration 
January 11, 2013

nuestrahermana:

mujeristaxicana:

My mother is the most precious thing I have in my life. Maria Arreola, my loving mother, risked her life in (YEAR SHE LEFT MEXICO) when she left my abusive father and migrated to the U.S. seeking safety for her children and herself. 

Last night, Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE), trespassed into to my home without a warrant and apprehended my mother. My brother, who was next door at a friends house, was also handcuffed and taken by ICE. 

I can’t believe I am living this nightmare. I need your help! I cannot begin to imagine what my life would be without my mother. Right now your voice is the only thing that can help keep my family together.




We have to end this now. Help us keep this family together.

Thank you,

Erika Andiola


sign petition at:

http://act.presente.org/sign/erika/?akid=754.379711.cSIg1J&rd=1&t=1


Please signal boost this everyone.

LTMC: Nothing says America like deporting battered women back to their abusive spouses in Mexico.

(via dkyubey)

November 4, 2012
I came across this photo earlier today, with the following caption:

A woman, who declined to give her name, is hugged by her husband as they chat between the border fence separating Nogales, Ariz., and Nogales, Sonora, Mexico, Wednesday, July 28, 2010.

Heart-breaking, and yet, hopeful.

I came across this photo earlier today, with the following caption:

A woman, who declined to give her name, is hugged by her husband as they chat between the border fence separating Nogales, Ariz., and Nogales, Sonora, Mexico, Wednesday, July 28, 2010.

Heart-breaking, and yet, hopeful.

September 6, 2012
"Stop blaming welfare recipients, unions, immigrants, gays… for your problems."

Obama (via kateoplis)

But…

It’s Official: Obama Has Deported More Than A Million Unauthorized Immigrants

(via mohandasgandhi)

Faith without works, Mr. Obama.  Faith without works.

(via mohandasgandhi)

August 25, 2012
Ignorance On Immigration Reform In New York

New York Assemblywoman Nicole Malliotakis recently posted a link on her Facebook page to her self-written op-ed appearing on the Staten Island Advance’s website.  In her letter, she discusses a recent New York Assembly bill that allows non-citizen children of undocumented immigrants to receive financial aid for college under certain circumstances.  Malliotakis feels that this constitutes an unfair handout of New York taxpayer money to people who have no right to be in the country, and which should be used to help American taxpayers, not illegal immigrants:

Last weekend, Assembly Democrats announced legislation (A.10807) which would offer taxpayer-funded financial aid to illegal aliens attending college in New York. 

I firmly believe that, in a time of fiscal uncertainty when education funding is scarce, this is an ill-conceived proposal. To take resources from American citizens to give to those who are in this country illegally is plain wrong … . 

There are countless American citizens, including those born on American soil and immigrants registered through the proper channels, who are struggling to pay for college. 

As someone who worked through college and came from a family that sacrificed to afford my education, I know the financial toll that tuition takes on a family. 

With the average 2010 college graduate in New York facing more than $26,000 worth of student-loan debt, extending benefits to illegal aliens is wrong and unfair to legal American citizens who need support. 

Of course, the only reason this would be unfair is if illegal immigrants were receiving something for nothing; in other words, if they weren’t paying any taxes at all.  Indeed, this sentiment is readily on display in the facebook comments, some of which reek of outright hatred for one’s fellow man.  Here’s a couple examples:

“Under what circumstances does ANYONE believe that illegals who do not pay taxes or contribute to Social Security are entitled to payouts?? If there is so much money in the budget I have 2 children in college who would like to attend for free.”

“My two sons have student loans looming over their heads and they can’t even find a jobs yet. Yet this government continues to fund forefingers [sic], give them opportunities while we the tax payers suffer.

One commenter tried to get everyone to see the light of day:

[In order to qualify for aid,] the bill/existing-law requires that one must have attended at least 2 years and graduated from a NY high school. Those who would qualify must have been brought here by someone else when they were minors and basically grew up here just as their “legal” counterparts. In most cases they do not know they are different until they graduate high school and discover they’re out of luck for getting college education because of the current situation. Those who would qualify are basically American raised children who had no say about -nor comprehension of being brought here. Why are we trying to prevent them from being an added value to our society by continuing their education and instead pushing them to what would lead to bad things. I didn’t know about this till you posted about it and I am no Democrat (look at my postings), but aren’t there other ways to fix immigration issues without punishing and loosing who are (in effect) American children?

The immediate response was absolutely sickening:

[T]he failure of our government to deport their parents is the problem.  We, the taxpayers, do not need to, and should not , pay for them. Let me give it to you straight, who helped my kid out? Her father and I work and paid taxes.  She was born here. We sacrificed and did without to let her go to college, this way she would not have debt. My father saved also and she used that money, as well. How dare you suggest we, the middle class, support kids that are not our own? No one helps us, God knows, and the fact that these greedy people have their hands out yet again, is sickening. Where are the parents? Sending money to their homelands, if they do work and work off the books, and then tapping our taxpayer money? I have had enough of the grubbers.

Look at the trend in these comments.  Every single person who opposes this bill is angry because they feel that illegal immigrants are either (a) getting something for nothing, or (b), living off of their tax dollars.  They don’t seem to care that the bill only provides support in exceptional cases where a child has essentially been born and raised in America, but happens to be an illegal immigrant.  They don’t seem to give a sh*t if a kid is a high-school valedictorian who we try to deport because, well, f#$% her for not being born in America.  They don’t care that our zeal to visit untold political retribution on the families of illegal immigrants often results in tragic consequences that are unnecessarily cruel and inhumane, and in many cases, counterproductive.  

But moreover, it is simply wrong that illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes.  The Immigration Policy Center released a study in 2011 finding that illegal immigrants paid well over a billion dollars in state and local taxes in 2010.  In New York, immigrants paid over $662 million in taxes.  So this is not a case of illegal immigrants getting something for nothing.  In the 2010-11 fiscal year, total New York tax receipts were roughly $39 billion.  That means that tax receipts from illegal immigrants accounted for close to 2% of New York State tax revenues, while undocumented immigrants only accounted for roughly three percent of the population of New York State.  If we take these numbers at face value, an estimated two out of every three illegal immigrants in New York are arguably paying their “fair share.”  Deporting every single one of these illegal immigrants from New York would theoretically cost the state $662 million in tax revenues, with the accompanying reduction in services or increase in taxes that would be necessary to fill the budget gap.

This is yet another example of how a complete lack of contact with the people affected by a policy (how many of these individuals have ever actually met a family with illegal immigrants among its members?) tends to generate unabashed and completely unjustified resentment of the affected group.  This lack of human contact allows otherwise decent folk to turn real people into abstract ideas by displacing their humanity with a nasty label.  Undocumented immigrants cease to be people when we can simply call them “illegals.”  We convert them from complex human beings into mere wrongdoers and freeloaders with a loaded label.  And the human wreckage that follows from harsh immigration policies thereby gets lost in an abstract mixture of nationalism and enthocentric resentment, because they will never have to meet the people whose lives are shattered by overbearing immigration enforcement.

June 15, 2012
"The Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA) today praised President Barack Obama for announcing administrative action that will make an estimated 800,000 undocumented immigrants eligible for work permits. Immigrants who came to the United States as children and have since led law-abiding lives will be granted an opportunity to defer their deportation and qualify for a 2-year residency if they meet certain criteria. The administrative action achieves this key objective of the DREAM Act which has spent a decade pending in Congress."

Press Release from the Hispanic National bar Association, June 15, 2012, via Hispanic Tips

It won’t bring back all the people INS has deported in record numbers, but it’s a start.

March 13, 2012
If The Government Has To Lie In Order To Enforce A Law, Something Is Probably Wrong With The Law.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »